Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Manan Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs sebi appeal no.52 of 2012 sat order dated 4 april 2012

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI

            Appeal No. 52 of 2012 

    Date of decision: 4.4.2012     

Manan Trading Pvt. Ltd.
325, Amrit Diamond House,
Opera House,
Mumbai-400 004

                                     ……Appellant 

Versus

Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Bhavan, Plot No. C-4A, G-Block,
Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E)
Mumbai- 400 051

                                …… Respondent 

Mr. Ankit Lohia, Advocate with Mr. Manish Chhangani, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Kumar Desai, Advocate with Ms. Da ya Gupta and Ms. Harshada Nagare,
Advocates for the Respondent.
CORAM : P.K. Malhotra, Member
S.S.N. Moorthy, Member
Per : P.K. Malhotra, Member (Oral)
This appeal is directed against the ex-parte ad -interim order dated
April 23, 2009 in the matter of Pyramid Saimira Theatre Limited. It is the grievance of
the appellant that inspite of personal hear ing having been grante d and reply filed, the
Board has neither passed any order nor vacated the ex-parte ad-interim order.

  1. We have heard the learned counsel fo r the parties for some time and having
    regard to the role allegedly played by th e appellant as disclosed in the impugned order
    and also taking note of the fact that the a ppellant has remained out of the securities
    market for a considerably long period, we ar e inclined to stay, qua the appellant, the
    operation of the impugned order. It is made cl ear that the order that we have passed 2
    shall be without prejudice to the rights of the respondent Board to proceed further in the
    matter and shall not be taken as an expressi on of our opinion on the merits of the case.
    The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- P.K.Malhotra Member

Sd/-
S.S.N. Moorthy
Member
4.4.2012
Prepared & Compared By: Pk

Leave a Comment